RESULTS: “Not true” finding in a motion to revoke felony probation where new sex offense alleged

Our client faced serious allegations of a sex offense against a child, which was presented as a violation of his felony probation. In such proceedings, the standard of proof required to revoke probation is the preponderance of the evidence, which is significantly lower than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard used in criminal trials.

Defense Strategy

Led by Mr. Blizzard, our firm’s defense strategy focused on dismantling the credibility of the allegations.

Through a meticulous examination of the evidence, Mr. Blizzard successfully argued that the accusations were vague and the timeline inconsistent. A crucial element of the defense involved presenting conclusive evidence that suggested coaching by the child’s mother, which ultimately cast doubt on the reliability of the claims against our client.

Outcome

The case concluded with a contested trial before the judge, resulting in the judge determining the allegation as “not true.”

This outcome reaffirmed the necessity of a rigorous defense approach, illustrating Mr. Blizzard’s expertise in navigating complex legal proceedings and securing justice for our clients.

This case highlights our commitment to providing a robust defense for those facing serious allegations, ensuring that every client receives a fair and thorough examination of their case.